Drop Down MenusCSS Drop Down MenuPure CSS Dropdown Menu

Thursday, January 22, 2015

Adolescence and child behaviour

By early adolescence, however, a child "can see clearly many alternatives to parental directives, and a parent must be able to defend rationally, as she would to an adult, a directive with which the adolescent disagrees. . . . The adolescent cannot be forced physi- cally to obey over any period of time." Gentle Threats As they try to discover more and more about human behavior in general and in particular child behavior and the influence of training upon it, psychologists report interesting findings. 

Often, these cannot be considered definitive, clearly established; for that, there must be many repetitions of the experiments and confirmation of the findings by many workers. But sometimes a finding is of a type that, even though not definitively established as valid, is provocative, worth thought, and possibly even worth trial by parents. One of these is a finding that if you want to instill values in children, speaks softly and carries a small stick. Big sticks may control behavior but small sticks change attitudes. 

This thesis comes from Dr. Elliot Aronson, a University of Texas psychologist, who induced children to turn their back on toys they really liked and to decide they didn't like them after all. The technique used was request, followed by a mild threat-which meant that the child had to build his own internal justifications for not playing with the toys in order to comply with the request. Dr. Aronson and his colleagues first spent days playing with the chil- dren and building rapport. Then, picking out a favorite toy of each child in one group, an experimenter said, "If you play with this toy, I will be a little cross with you." 

The experimenter then left the room. In another group, the children were more severely threatened with possible loss of all the toys plus the friendship of the experimenters.

The results were quite startling. Very few children under mild threat played with the interdicted toy. But many of the severely threatened did. And two months later the first group still ignored the toy. That the effect lasted for 60 days is "absolutely phenomenal," Dr. Aronson says, and it indi- cates a long-term attitude change. He sees no reason why the same effect would not work when dealing with more important values. Preventing Self-devaluation There have always been self-devaluative individuals, those who have a feeling of being unacceptable to them.